登录
Ⅴ. 阅读理解，选择最佳选项。
Getting kids to exercise or join in any kind of physical activity can be difficult for a lot of parents. But researchers have found that poor motor（肌肉运动的）skills won't stop kids from being physically（身体上）fit. In fact, they say kids with poor motor skills are likely to have the same excellent physical fitness.
The researchers checked the motor skills, body fat, and aerobic（有氧的）fitness levels of over 330 kids between the ages of 7 and 11 in the study. To check the aerobic ability, the kids were asked to take a bike riding test and slowly increase the amount of a bicycle workout. As the kids exercised, the researchers measured（测量）their maximal oxygen uptake（最大摄氧量）, which shows physical fitness based on how well the body uses oxygen（氧气）during exercise.
The study showed that the kids' motor skills didn't play a role in their performance in the aerobic fitness test. Those with weaker motor skills were just as physically fit as other kids in the study who had stronger motor skills.
The researchers also learnt that the kids' weight didn't show their physical fitness. These findings match those from another recent study, which found that being active in exercise is more important for kids' health than their body mass index（BMI）. It's important for kids to understand the importance of exercise, so they can develop healthy habits that last beyond childhood.
"Our study clearly showed that aerobic fitness is not linked to motor skills when we think about body composition（构成）," Dr Haapala said. "Also, aerobic fitness was not strongly linked to overweight or obesity. That is to say, the kids' weight couldn't be a sign of their physical health."
The researchers hope that these findings are encouraging for schools and parents—especially for those who have kids with poor motor skills.
(
A. be physically fit
B. have a strong mind
C. be a clever person
D. enjoy doing exercise
(
A. Why the study was done.
B. How the researchers did the study.
C. Who took part in the study.
D. What the researchers found in the study.
(
A. To ask kids to care about their body mass index.
B. To let kids have better childhood experience.
C. To help kids to learn about their physical fitness.
D. To show kids' weight can't decide their physical fitness.
(
A. BMI doesn't play a key role in kids' aerobic ability.
B. Kids' physical fitness is linked to their motor skills.
C. Kids' aerobic ability can show their physical health.
D. Being active in exercise isn't helpful for kids' physical fitness.
Getting kids to exercise or join in any kind of physical activity can be difficult for a lot of parents. But researchers have found that poor motor（肌肉运动的）skills won't stop kids from being physically（身体上）fit. In fact, they say kids with poor motor skills are likely to have the same excellent physical fitness.
The researchers checked the motor skills, body fat, and aerobic（有氧的）fitness levels of over 330 kids between the ages of 7 and 11 in the study. To check the aerobic ability, the kids were asked to take a bike riding test and slowly increase the amount of a bicycle workout. As the kids exercised, the researchers measured（测量）their maximal oxygen uptake（最大摄氧量）, which shows physical fitness based on how well the body uses oxygen（氧气）during exercise.
The study showed that the kids' motor skills didn't play a role in their performance in the aerobic fitness test. Those with weaker motor skills were just as physically fit as other kids in the study who had stronger motor skills.
The researchers also learnt that the kids' weight didn't show their physical fitness. These findings match those from another recent study, which found that being active in exercise is more important for kids' health than their body mass index（BMI）. It's important for kids to understand the importance of exercise, so they can develop healthy habits that last beyond childhood.
"Our study clearly showed that aerobic fitness is not linked to motor skills when we think about body composition（构成）," Dr Haapala said. "Also, aerobic fitness was not strongly linked to overweight or obesity. That is to say, the kids' weight couldn't be a sign of their physical health."
The researchers hope that these findings are encouraging for schools and parents—especially for those who have kids with poor motor skills.
(
A
) 1. According to the research, if a child is not good at motor skills, he or she can still .A. be physically fit
B. have a strong mind
C. be a clever person
D. enjoy doing exercise
(
B
) 2. What's Paragraph 2 mainly about?A. Why the study was done.
B. How the researchers did the study.
C. Who took part in the study.
D. What the researchers found in the study.
(
D
) 3. Why does the writer mention another study in Paragraph 4?A. To ask kids to care about their body mass index.
B. To let kids have better childhood experience.
C. To help kids to learn about their physical fitness.
D. To show kids' weight can't decide their physical fitness.
(
C
) 4. What can we learn from the passage?A. BMI doesn't play a key role in kids' aerobic ability.
B. Kids' physical fitness is linked to their motor skills.
C. Kids' aerobic ability can show their physical health.
D. Being active in exercise isn't helpful for kids' physical fitness.
答案
1. A 2. B 3. D 4. C
解析
【分析】
本题为英语阅读理解题，包含细节理解、主旨大意、推理判断三类题型。解题思路：1. 细节题需根据题干关键词定位原文对应内容，对比选项匹配答案；2. 主旨题需梳理段落核心内容，明确研究过程或结论；3. 推理题需结合上下文逻辑，分析作者提及相关内容的意图。
【解析】
1. 第1题：根据题干关键词“poor motor skills”定位原文第一段，由“poor motor skills won't stop kids from being physically fit... kids with poor motor skills are likely to have the same excellent physical fitness”可知，运动技能差的孩子仍能身体健康，对应选项A。
2. 第2题：第二段主要介绍研究人员对330名7-11岁孩子的运动技能、体脂、有氧水平的检测方法（骑车测试、测量最大摄氧量），核心是研究的实施过程，对应选项B。
3. 第3题：第四段先提出“孩子体重不能体现体能”，再提及另一项研究结论“运动比BMI更重要”，目的是支撑“体重不能决定体能”的观点，对应选项D。
4. 第4题：逐一分析选项：A项原文未提及BMI与有氧能力的关系；B项与原文“aerobic fitness is not linked to motor skills”矛盾；C项由“maximal oxygen uptake shows physical fitness”可推知有氧能力能反映健康；D项与“being active in exercise is more important for kids' health”矛盾，对应选项C。
【答案】
1.A 2.B 3.D 4.C
【知识点】
英语阅读理解、细节理解、主旨大意
【点评】
本文为科普类阅读理解，围绕儿童体能与运动技能、体重的关系展开，题型基础，需学生精准定位原文信息，难度适中。
【难度系数】
0.7
本题为英语阅读理解题，包含细节理解、主旨大意、推理判断三类题型。解题思路：1. 细节题需根据题干关键词定位原文对应内容，对比选项匹配答案；2. 主旨题需梳理段落核心内容，明确研究过程或结论；3. 推理题需结合上下文逻辑，分析作者提及相关内容的意图。
【解析】
1. 第1题：根据题干关键词“poor motor skills”定位原文第一段，由“poor motor skills won't stop kids from being physically fit... kids with poor motor skills are likely to have the same excellent physical fitness”可知，运动技能差的孩子仍能身体健康，对应选项A。
2. 第2题：第二段主要介绍研究人员对330名7-11岁孩子的运动技能、体脂、有氧水平的检测方法（骑车测试、测量最大摄氧量），核心是研究的实施过程，对应选项B。
3. 第3题：第四段先提出“孩子体重不能体现体能”，再提及另一项研究结论“运动比BMI更重要”，目的是支撑“体重不能决定体能”的观点，对应选项D。
4. 第4题：逐一分析选项：A项原文未提及BMI与有氧能力的关系；B项与原文“aerobic fitness is not linked to motor skills”矛盾；C项由“maximal oxygen uptake shows physical fitness”可推知有氧能力能反映健康；D项与“being active in exercise is more important for kids' health”矛盾，对应选项C。
【答案】
1.A 2.B 3.D 4.C
【知识点】
英语阅读理解、细节理解、主旨大意
【点评】
本文为科普类阅读理解，围绕儿童体能与运动技能、体重的关系展开，题型基础，需学生精准定位原文信息，难度适中。
【难度系数】
0.7
