登录
Ⅱ. 阅读短文,根据短文内容回答问题。
Rules are everywhere in our lives. Schools, families, and societies all have rules to help people live safely and fairly. However, here is a question:should we follow the rules all the time? Let's talk about this topic.
First, rules are important. For example, traffic rules keep drivers and walkers safe. If people don't wait for the red lights, accidents might happen. In the same way, school rules like "no cheating" give a fair environment to students.
But sometimes, blindly following rules can cause problems. When a fire breaks out in a building, if everyone strictly follows the "no running" rule in hallways, escaping(逃离) quickly becomes difficult. In such cases, breaking the rule is smarter.
What's more, creativity(创造力) often needs people to break old rules. Great men, like Picasso or Edison, changed old ideas to create something new.
So, when should we follow rules strictly, and when should we think in a smart way? The key is to understand the purpose(目的) of the rules. If a rule no longer helps people, it's time to improve it.
1. Why should we follow traffic rules?
2. Give one example to show "breaking a rule is smarter sometimes".
3. Why does the author mention great men like Picasso and Edison?
4. When should we improve an old rule?
5. In your opinion, how should people deal with rules? Express your idea in about 20 words.
Rules are everywhere in our lives. Schools, families, and societies all have rules to help people live safely and fairly. However, here is a question:should we follow the rules all the time? Let's talk about this topic.
First, rules are important. For example, traffic rules keep drivers and walkers safe. If people don't wait for the red lights, accidents might happen. In the same way, school rules like "no cheating" give a fair environment to students.
But sometimes, blindly following rules can cause problems. When a fire breaks out in a building, if everyone strictly follows the "no running" rule in hallways, escaping(逃离) quickly becomes difficult. In such cases, breaking the rule is smarter.
What's more, creativity(创造力) often needs people to break old rules. Great men, like Picasso or Edison, changed old ideas to create something new.
So, when should we follow rules strictly, and when should we think in a smart way? The key is to understand the purpose(目的) of the rules. If a rule no longer helps people, it's time to improve it.
1. Why should we follow traffic rules?
Because traffic rules keep us(drivers and walkers) safe.
2. Give one example to show "breaking a rule is smarter sometimes".
If a fire breaks out in a building, we shouldn’t follow the “no running” rule but escape quickly.
3. Why does the author mention great men like Picasso and Edison?
To show that creativity often requires breaking old rules.
4. When should we improve an old rule?
If an old rule no longer helps people, we need to improve it.
5. In your opinion, how should people deal with rules? Express your idea in about 20 words.
We should follow rules strictly in our daily life but sometimes we can break the rules in special situations.
答案
1. Because traffic rules keep us(drivers and walkers) safe.
2. If a fire breaks out in a building, we shouldn’t follow the “no running” rule but escape quickly.
3. To show that creativity often requires breaking old rules.
4. If an old rule no longer helps people, we need to improve it.
5. We should follow rules strictly in our daily life but sometimes we can break the rules in special situations.（仅供参考,言之有理即可）
2. If a fire breaks out in a building, we shouldn’t follow the “no running” rule but escape quickly.
3. To show that creativity often requires breaking old rules.
4. If an old rule no longer helps people, we need to improve it.
5. We should follow rules strictly in our daily life but sometimes we can break the rules in special situations.（仅供参考,言之有理即可）
解析
【分析】
本题为英语阅读理解的细节理解与主旨类题目，解题思路为：1. 通读短文把握核心话题（是否需一直遵守规则）；2. 针对每个问题定位原文对应段落，提取关键信息；3. 前4题为细节题，直接整合原文语句作答；第5题为开放题，结合文章主旨（理解规则目的、灵活处理），用约20词表达合理观点。
【解析】
1. 定位短文第二段，提取“traffic rules keep drivers and walkers safe”的核心原因作答；2. 定位短文第三段，找到火灾时不遵守“不奔跑”规则逃生的例子；3. 定位短文第四段，该段举例是为支撑“创造力常需打破旧规则”的观点；4. 定位短文最后一段，提取规则需改进的条件；5. 结合文章主旨，表达灵活处理规则的合理观点。
【答案】
1. Because traffic rules keep us (drivers and walkers) safe.
2. If a fire breaks out in a building, we shouldn’t follow the “no running” rule but escape quickly.
3. To show that creativity often requires breaking old rules.
4. If an old rule no longer helps people, we need to improve it.
5. We should follow rules strictly in daily life but break them in special situations when needed.
【知识点】
英语阅读理解、细节理解题、主旨大意题
【点评】
本题考查学生对英语短文的信息定位与理解能力，题型常规，难度适中，需准确提取原文信息并合理表达观点。
【难度系数】
0.7
本题为英语阅读理解的细节理解与主旨类题目，解题思路为：1. 通读短文把握核心话题（是否需一直遵守规则）；2. 针对每个问题定位原文对应段落，提取关键信息；3. 前4题为细节题，直接整合原文语句作答；第5题为开放题，结合文章主旨（理解规则目的、灵活处理），用约20词表达合理观点。
【解析】
1. 定位短文第二段，提取“traffic rules keep drivers and walkers safe”的核心原因作答；2. 定位短文第三段，找到火灾时不遵守“不奔跑”规则逃生的例子；3. 定位短文第四段，该段举例是为支撑“创造力常需打破旧规则”的观点；4. 定位短文最后一段，提取规则需改进的条件；5. 结合文章主旨，表达灵活处理规则的合理观点。
【答案】
1. Because traffic rules keep us (drivers and walkers) safe.
2. If a fire breaks out in a building, we shouldn’t follow the “no running” rule but escape quickly.
3. To show that creativity often requires breaking old rules.
4. If an old rule no longer helps people, we need to improve it.
5. We should follow rules strictly in daily life but break them in special situations when needed.
【知识点】
英语阅读理解、细节理解题、主旨大意题
【点评】
本题考查学生对英语短文的信息定位与理解能力，题型常规，难度适中，需准确提取原文信息并合理表达观点。
【难度系数】
0.7
