C
My name is David. I come from America but I live in China now. Last Saturday
I visited Hangzhou with my parents. We got there by train. There are many in-
teresting places in Hangzhou. We wanted to visit West Lake西湖, but we
did not know the way. We asked a policeman for help and he told us to take
the No.7 bus and get off at the fourth stop. Then we walked along West Lake
and took many photos there. We had a good time in Hangzhou. West Lake is
bigger than Xuanwu Lake玄武湖 in Nanjing. But Xuanwu Lake is as beauti-
ful as West Lake. I like both lakes.
(
(
(
(
(
(
My name is David. I come from America but I live in China now. Last Saturday
I visited Hangzhou with my parents. We got there by train. There are many in-
teresting places in Hangzhou. We wanted to visit West Lake西湖, but we
did not know the way. We asked a policeman for help and he told us to take
the No.7 bus and get off at the fourth stop. Then we walked along West Lake
and took many photos there. We had a good time in Hangzhou. West Lake is
bigger than Xuanwu Lake玄武湖 in Nanjing. But Xuanwu Lake is as beauti-
ful as West Lake. I like both lakes.
(
T
)1. David visited Hangzhou last weekend.(
T
)2. He visited Hangzhou with his parents.(
F
)3. He got to Hangzhou by bus.(
T
)4. They asked a policeman for help.(
T
)5. Xuanwu Lake is smaller than West Lake.(
F
)6. Xuanwu Lake is more beautiful than West Lake.答案
1—6 TTFTTF
解析
【分析】
这是一篇阅读理解细节判断题,解题思路非常清晰:首先先通读全文,了解文章大意是David介绍自己上周和父母游览杭州西湖的经历;之后逐题划出题干的核心关键词,带着关键词回到原文定位对应的语句,比对题干信息和原文内容是否完全匹配,信息一致则判断为正确(T),信息矛盾则判断为错误(F)。解题时要注意部分题目需要做简单的语义转换,比如比较级的同义替换,不要直接看到原句没完全一样就误判。
【解析】
1. 定位原文"Last Saturday I visited Hangzhou with my parents.",上周六属于上周末的范畴,题干表述和原文一致,判为T。
2. 定位原文"Last Saturday I visited Hangzhou with my parents.",明确说明David是和父母一起游览杭州,题干表述和原文一致,判为T。
3. 定位原文"We got there by train.",说明一家人是坐火车抵达杭州,并非题干所说的坐公交,信息矛盾,判为F。
4. 定位原文"We asked a policeman for help and he told us to take the No.7 bus and get off at the fourth stop.",和题干表述完全一致,判为T。
5. 定位原文"West Lake is bigger than Xuanwu Lake in Nanjing.",西湖比玄武湖大,等价于玄武湖比西湖小,题干表述符合原文逻辑,判为T。
6. 定位原文"But Xuanwu Lake is as beautiful as West Lake.",说明玄武湖和西湖一样美,并非玄武湖比西湖更美,信息矛盾,判为F。
【答案】
1—6 TTFTTF
【知识点】
阅读细节判断,形容词比较级,文本信息定位
【点评】
本题属于基础级的阅读判断题,绝大多数题干的信息都可以直接在原文找到对应内容,仅个别题目涉及简单的比较级同义转换,既考察学生快速定位文本信息的能力,也能巩固形容词比较级的相关知识点,整体难度较低。
【难度系数】
0.8
这是一篇阅读理解细节判断题,解题思路非常清晰:首先先通读全文,了解文章大意是David介绍自己上周和父母游览杭州西湖的经历;之后逐题划出题干的核心关键词,带着关键词回到原文定位对应的语句,比对题干信息和原文内容是否完全匹配,信息一致则判断为正确(T),信息矛盾则判断为错误(F)。解题时要注意部分题目需要做简单的语义转换,比如比较级的同义替换,不要直接看到原句没完全一样就误判。
【解析】
1. 定位原文"Last Saturday I visited Hangzhou with my parents.",上周六属于上周末的范畴,题干表述和原文一致,判为T。
2. 定位原文"Last Saturday I visited Hangzhou with my parents.",明确说明David是和父母一起游览杭州,题干表述和原文一致,判为T。
3. 定位原文"We got there by train.",说明一家人是坐火车抵达杭州,并非题干所说的坐公交,信息矛盾,判为F。
4. 定位原文"We asked a policeman for help and he told us to take the No.7 bus and get off at the fourth stop.",和题干表述完全一致,判为T。
5. 定位原文"West Lake is bigger than Xuanwu Lake in Nanjing.",西湖比玄武湖大,等价于玄武湖比西湖小,题干表述符合原文逻辑,判为T。
6. 定位原文"But Xuanwu Lake is as beautiful as West Lake.",说明玄武湖和西湖一样美,并非玄武湖比西湖更美,信息矛盾,判为F。
【答案】
1—6 TTFTTF
【知识点】
阅读细节判断,形容词比较级,文本信息定位
【点评】
本题属于基础级的阅读判断题,绝大多数题干的信息都可以直接在原文找到对应内容,仅个别题目涉及简单的比较级同义转换,既考察学生快速定位文本信息的能力,也能巩固形容词比较级的相关知识点,整体难度较低。
【难度系数】
0.8
D
There are three children in Green's family: John, Jack and Kate. They all
study in the same school. John is in Grade Six, Jack is in Grade Three and
Kate is in Grade One. They work very hard. They are now studying Chinese.
They have lunch at school. They often go home at four thirty. Sometimes
they go home at five. Their father and mother are both teachers. They teach
English. They work in a middle school.
(
(
(
(
(
There are three children in Green's family: John, Jack and Kate. They all
study in the same school. John is in Grade Six, Jack is in Grade Three and
Kate is in Grade One. They work very hard. They are now studying Chinese.
They have lunch at school. They often go home at four thirty. Sometimes
they go home at five. Their father and mother are both teachers. They teach
English. They work in a middle school.
(
F
)1. Kate has one brother.(
F
)2. John, Jack and Kate are in the same grade.(
T
)3. They have lunch at school.(
T
)4. They sometimes go home at five.(
F
)5. Their father and mother are Chinese teachers.答案
1—5 FFTTF
解析
【分析】
这是一篇英语阅读正误判断题,解题思路非常清晰:第一步先通读完整短文,梳理清楚文中的人物身份、就读年级、日常作息、父母职业这些核心信息;第二步每一道小题都单独回到原文中定位对应的描述,逐字比对题干表述和原文内容是否完全吻合,完全吻合就判为正确,存在矛盾就判为错误,不需要额外做复杂推理,所有答案都能在原文直接找到依据。
【解析】
我们逐题对照原文判断:
1. 原文明确提到格林家有三个孩子:John、Jack和Kate,其中John和Jack都是男孩,因此Kate有2个兄弟,题干表述“Kate has one brother.”和原文矛盾,所以错误。
2. 原文说明John在六年级,Jack在三年级,Kate在一年级,三人不在同一个年级,题干表述“are in the same grade.”和原文矛盾,所以错误。
3. 原文直接给出句子“They have lunch at school.”,和题干表述完全一致,所以正确。
4. 原文直接给出句子“Sometimes they go home at five.”,和题干表述完全一致,所以正确。
5. 原文说明他们的父母都是老师,教英语,是英语老师,题干表述“are Chinese teachers.”和原文矛盾,所以错误。
【答案】
1-5 FFTTF
【知识点】
1. 阅读细节查找
2. 短文信息比对
3. 正误判断
【点评】
本题属于基础级的小学英语阅读题型,所有考点都属于原文直接给出的细节内容,没有设置干扰性的推理考点,只要学生足够细心,能够准确定位到每道题对应的原文语句,就可以轻松选出正确答案,主要用于锻炼学生的文本信息提取能力。
【难度系数】
0.8
这是一篇英语阅读正误判断题,解题思路非常清晰:第一步先通读完整短文,梳理清楚文中的人物身份、就读年级、日常作息、父母职业这些核心信息;第二步每一道小题都单独回到原文中定位对应的描述,逐字比对题干表述和原文内容是否完全吻合,完全吻合就判为正确,存在矛盾就判为错误,不需要额外做复杂推理,所有答案都能在原文直接找到依据。
【解析】
我们逐题对照原文判断:
1. 原文明确提到格林家有三个孩子:John、Jack和Kate,其中John和Jack都是男孩,因此Kate有2个兄弟,题干表述“Kate has one brother.”和原文矛盾,所以错误。
2. 原文说明John在六年级,Jack在三年级,Kate在一年级,三人不在同一个年级,题干表述“are in the same grade.”和原文矛盾,所以错误。
3. 原文直接给出句子“They have lunch at school.”,和题干表述完全一致,所以正确。
4. 原文直接给出句子“Sometimes they go home at five.”,和题干表述完全一致,所以正确。
5. 原文说明他们的父母都是老师,教英语,是英语老师,题干表述“are Chinese teachers.”和原文矛盾,所以错误。
【答案】
1-5 FFTTF
【知识点】
1. 阅读细节查找
2. 短文信息比对
3. 正误判断
【点评】
本题属于基础级的小学英语阅读题型,所有考点都属于原文直接给出的细节内容,没有设置干扰性的推理考点,只要学生足够细心,能够准确定位到每道题对应的原文语句,就可以轻松选出正确答案,主要用于锻炼学生的文本信息提取能力。
【难度系数】
0.8
登录