登录
训练3 体裁：议论文 主题：教育 难度：★★★★★ 建议用时：8 min 正确率：/5
新素养·思维品质 For thousands of years, humans have been writing by hand to communicate, keep records, and express their ideas and feelings. Handwriting continues to live even with the invention of the typewriter and computer. It especially holds great importance in school. In some exams, students' handwriting is even graded. People have different ideas about this.
Agree
• If students are being graded on their handwriting, they will take this important skill seriously. Even if they have poor handwriting to start with, it can be improved with practice. Grading will only push them to do better and make them feel proud of their progress.
• Regular handwriting practice is good for the brain(脑). Writing makes different parts of the brain start working at the same time, which helps build a powerful brain. Besides, it develops students' thinking skills like planning and organizing. It also improves their ability to focus.
• The value of handwriting goes beyond school. Writing is part of students' daily lives. They take notes in class, write a birthday card, or leave a message. Beautiful handwriting adds a touch of art and warmth to what they write, making these daily experiences more enjoyable.
Disagree
• We live in a digital world. We use keyboards and other digital tools more and more. Students often show their work online. Since perfect handwriting is no longer important, why give students the pressure of one more grade to worry about?
• It is unfair（不公平的） because it pays no attention to the differences in students' natural abilities. Some students have less-developed fine-motor（精细运动） skills. They have difficulty writing well. They shouldn't be asked to write as beautifully as those who have better fine-motor skills.
• Students should be mainly graded on the ideas they express. What they think is much more important than the way they write. A student with great thinking ability shouldn't be graded low just because of his poor handwriting. Albert Einstein and Pablo Picasso had poor handwriting, but look at their great achievements.
There is no clear right or wrong answer to whether students' handwriting should be graded. Schools can decide whether to do it according to different teaching goals and students' needs.
1. How can students improve their handwriting?
2. How many reasons are given to show handwriting practice is good for the brain?
3. What bad influence may grading handwriting have on students?
4. Why are Albert Einstein and Pablo Picasso mentioned?
5. What's your idea about whether students' handwriting should be graded? Why do you think so?
新素养·思维品质 For thousands of years, humans have been writing by hand to communicate, keep records, and express their ideas and feelings. Handwriting continues to live even with the invention of the typewriter and computer. It especially holds great importance in school. In some exams, students' handwriting is even graded. People have different ideas about this.
Agree
• If students are being graded on their handwriting, they will take this important skill seriously. Even if they have poor handwriting to start with, it can be improved with practice. Grading will only push them to do better and make them feel proud of their progress.
• Regular handwriting practice is good for the brain(脑). Writing makes different parts of the brain start working at the same time, which helps build a powerful brain. Besides, it develops students' thinking skills like planning and organizing. It also improves their ability to focus.
• The value of handwriting goes beyond school. Writing is part of students' daily lives. They take notes in class, write a birthday card, or leave a message. Beautiful handwriting adds a touch of art and warmth to what they write, making these daily experiences more enjoyable.
Disagree
• We live in a digital world. We use keyboards and other digital tools more and more. Students often show their work online. Since perfect handwriting is no longer important, why give students the pressure of one more grade to worry about?
• It is unfair（不公平的） because it pays no attention to the differences in students' natural abilities. Some students have less-developed fine-motor（精细运动） skills. They have difficulty writing well. They shouldn't be asked to write as beautifully as those who have better fine-motor skills.
• Students should be mainly graded on the ideas they express. What they think is much more important than the way they write. A student with great thinking ability shouldn't be graded low just because of his poor handwriting. Albert Einstein and Pablo Picasso had poor handwriting, but look at their great achievements.
There is no clear right or wrong answer to whether students' handwriting should be graded. Schools can decide whether to do it according to different teaching goals and students' needs.
1. How can students improve their handwriting?
Students can improve their handwriting through practice.
2. How many reasons are given to show handwriting practice is good for the brain?
Three/3.
3. What bad influence may grading handwriting have on students?
Grading handwriting may be unfair to students with less-developed fine-motor skills.
4. Why are Albert Einstein and Pablo Picasso mentioned?
They are mentioned to show that great ideas and achievements matter more than handwriting quality.
5. What's your idea about whether students' handwriting should be graded? Why do you think so?
I believe handwriting should be graded. Because it helps improve clarity and reading skills.(答案不唯一，言之有理即可)
答案
训练3 【语篇解读】本文是一篇议论文。文章主要论述了对学生的书写进行评分的不同观点。
1. Students can improve their handwriting through practice. 根据“Agree”中的“Even if they have poor handwriting to start with, it can be improved with practice.”可知，通过练习可以提升书写。
2. Three/3. 根据“Agree”中的“Writing makes different parts of the brain start working at the same time ... It also improves their ability to focus.”可知，列举了三个理由表明书写练习对大脑有益。
3. Grading handwriting may be unfair to students with less-developed fine-motor skills. 根据“Disagree”中的“It is unfair because it pays no attention to the differences in students' natural abilities. Some students have less-developed fine-motor skills.”可知，对一些精细运动技能发展较差的学生来说，给他们的书写评分是不公平的。
4. They are mentioned to show that great ideas and achievements matter more than handwriting quality. 根据“Disagree”中的“Students should be mainly graded on the ideas they express. What they think is much more important than the way they write.”和“Albert Einstein and Pablo Picasso had poor handwriting, but look at their great achievements.”可知，提到爱因斯坦和毕加索的例子是为了说明即使笔迹不好，也能有伟大成就，学生表达的思想和取得的成就远比书写重要。
5. I believe handwriting should be graded. Because it helps improve clarity and reading skills.(答案不唯一，言之有理即可)
1. Students can improve their handwriting through practice. 根据“Agree”中的“Even if they have poor handwriting to start with, it can be improved with practice.”可知，通过练习可以提升书写。
2. Three/3. 根据“Agree”中的“Writing makes different parts of the brain start working at the same time ... It also improves their ability to focus.”可知，列举了三个理由表明书写练习对大脑有益。
3. Grading handwriting may be unfair to students with less-developed fine-motor skills. 根据“Disagree”中的“It is unfair because it pays no attention to the differences in students' natural abilities. Some students have less-developed fine-motor skills.”可知，对一些精细运动技能发展较差的学生来说，给他们的书写评分是不公平的。
4. They are mentioned to show that great ideas and achievements matter more than handwriting quality. 根据“Disagree”中的“Students should be mainly graded on the ideas they express. What they think is much more important than the way they write.”和“Albert Einstein and Pablo Picasso had poor handwriting, but look at their great achievements.”可知，提到爱因斯坦和毕加索的例子是为了说明即使笔迹不好，也能有伟大成就，学生表达的思想和取得的成就远比书写重要。
5. I believe handwriting should be graded. Because it helps improve clarity and reading skills.(答案不唯一，言之有理即可)
解析
【分析】
本题为议论文阅读理解题，围绕“是否应给学生书写评分”展开，共5道题，前4道为细节理解题，第5道为开放表达题。解题思路：1. 定位原文中关于提升书写方法的内容，提取关键信息；2. 定位原文中书写对大脑有益的理由，计数得出答案；3. 定位原文中反对给书写评分的不良影响的内容，提取对应信息；4. 定位原文中爱因斯坦和毕加索的例子，分析其论证目的；5. 结合自身理解，围绕观点合理作答即可。
【解析】
1. 定位至“Agree”板块中“Even if they have poor handwriting to start with, it can be improved with practice.”，可知学生可通过练习提升书写，故答案为Students can improve their handwriting through practice.
2. 定位至“Agree”板块关于书写对大脑有益的内容：①书写使大脑不同区域同时工作，助力构建强大大脑；②培养规划、组织等思维技能；③提升专注力，共3个理由，故答案为Three/3.
3. 定位至“Disagree”板块中“It is unfair because it pays no attention to the differences in students' natural abilities. Some students have less-developed fine-motor skills.”，可知给书写评分对精细运动技能发展较差的学生不公平，故答案为Grading handwriting may be unfair to students with less-developed fine-motor skills.
4. 定位至“Disagree”板块中“Students should be mainly graded on the ideas they express. What they think is much more important than the way they write. Albert Einstein and Pablo Picasso had poor handwriting, but look at their great achievements.”，可知举二人例子是为了说明伟大的思想和成就比书写质量更重要，故答案为They are mentioned to show that great ideas and achievements matter more than handwriting quality.
5. 本题为开放题，结合自身理解作答即可，示例：I believe handwriting should be graded. Because it helps improve clarity and reading skills.
【答案】
1. Students can improve their handwriting through practice.
2. Three/3.
3. Grading handwriting may be unfair to students with less-developed fine-motor skills.
4. They are mentioned to show that great ideas and achievements matter more than handwriting quality.
5. I believe handwriting should be graded. Because it helps improve clarity and reading skills.(答案不唯一，言之有理即可)
【知识点】
英语阅读理解、细节理解、观点表达
【点评】
本题考查学生议论文阅读的信息定位、归纳及观点表达能力，前4道细节题难度较低，需准确提取原文信息，第5道开放题需结合自身逻辑合理作答，整体贴合初中英语阅读的考查方向。
【难度系数】
0.6
本题为议论文阅读理解题，围绕“是否应给学生书写评分”展开，共5道题，前4道为细节理解题，第5道为开放表达题。解题思路：1. 定位原文中关于提升书写方法的内容，提取关键信息；2. 定位原文中书写对大脑有益的理由，计数得出答案；3. 定位原文中反对给书写评分的不良影响的内容，提取对应信息；4. 定位原文中爱因斯坦和毕加索的例子，分析其论证目的；5. 结合自身理解，围绕观点合理作答即可。
【解析】
1. 定位至“Agree”板块中“Even if they have poor handwriting to start with, it can be improved with practice.”，可知学生可通过练习提升书写，故答案为Students can improve their handwriting through practice.
2. 定位至“Agree”板块关于书写对大脑有益的内容：①书写使大脑不同区域同时工作，助力构建强大大脑；②培养规划、组织等思维技能；③提升专注力，共3个理由，故答案为Three/3.
3. 定位至“Disagree”板块中“It is unfair because it pays no attention to the differences in students' natural abilities. Some students have less-developed fine-motor skills.”，可知给书写评分对精细运动技能发展较差的学生不公平，故答案为Grading handwriting may be unfair to students with less-developed fine-motor skills.
4. 定位至“Disagree”板块中“Students should be mainly graded on the ideas they express. What they think is much more important than the way they write. Albert Einstein and Pablo Picasso had poor handwriting, but look at their great achievements.”，可知举二人例子是为了说明伟大的思想和成就比书写质量更重要，故答案为They are mentioned to show that great ideas and achievements matter more than handwriting quality.
5. 本题为开放题，结合自身理解作答即可，示例：I believe handwriting should be graded. Because it helps improve clarity and reading skills.
【答案】
1. Students can improve their handwriting through practice.
2. Three/3.
3. Grading handwriting may be unfair to students with less-developed fine-motor skills.
4. They are mentioned to show that great ideas and achievements matter more than handwriting quality.
5. I believe handwriting should be graded. Because it helps improve clarity and reading skills.(答案不唯一，言之有理即可)
【知识点】
英语阅读理解、细节理解、观点表达
【点评】
本题考查学生议论文阅读的信息定位、归纳及观点表达能力，前4道细节题难度较低，需准确提取原文信息，第5道开放题需结合自身逻辑合理作答，整体贴合初中英语阅读的考查方向。
【难度系数】
0.6
