登录
(四)
主题:科学技术 体裁:议论文 难度:★★★★★ 建议用时:12分钟 正确率: /10
阅读下面的短文,并根据所读内容,在文章后表格中第1—8小题的空格里填入一个最恰当的词,9—10
题词数不限。
The world's oldest musical instruments are more than 40,000 years old. For thousands
of years, humans have been making music for pleasure and to express themselves.
Recently, there has been a rise in the use of artificial intelligence to create music. AI makes
music by analysing many different songs, learning patterns and details, and then mixing pieces
together. Some AI music has become so popular that it has been shared widely online.
However, some people think using AI to create music isn't truly original or creative
because it makes songs out of old music. What do you think? Is AI bad for creativity?
Yes—AI music isn't creative.
Using AI might be cheaper than paying a musician. If companies can use AI to produce popular
music that makes lots of money from people buying and listening to it, it could put musicians out of
work. If musicians can't earn money from music, there will be far fewer of them creating new songs.
Anyway, listening to music that was made by a computer isn't the same experience as listening to
human-made music. When musicians create songs, they put real feelings and experiences into their
work, which builds a deep connection with listeners through their music. Music produced by AI isn't
truly original, as it simply takes pieces from songs that have already been published. Therefore, it
cannot be considered creative.
No—AI can help spark new ideas.
When people turn on their radios or headphones and a great new song comes on, it makes them feel
good. A catchy tune brings people together to sing and dance. If people are enjoying music, who
cares whether it was made by a human or a machine? Music makers already use computers, which help
to perfect sound and mix different parts of a song. Like computers, AI can also help spark ideas. It
won't replace musicians but they can work with it. Building on music created by AI could save
time. It could allow lots more music to be produced and it could lead to new and special styles of music.
AI could create exciting tunes that humans could never have dreamed of.
1.
6.
10.
阅读与回答问题(每小题2分,满分60分)
主题:科学技术 体裁:议论文 难度:★★★★★ 建议用时:12分钟 正确率: /10
阅读下面的短文,并根据所读内容,在文章后表格中第1—8小题的空格里填入一个最恰当的词,9—10
题词数不限。
The world's oldest musical instruments are more than 40,000 years old. For thousands
of years, humans have been making music for pleasure and to express themselves.
Recently, there has been a rise in the use of artificial intelligence to create music. AI makes
music by analysing many different songs, learning patterns and details, and then mixing pieces
together. Some AI music has become so popular that it has been shared widely online.
However, some people think using AI to create music isn't truly original or creative
because it makes songs out of old music. What do you think? Is AI bad for creativity?
Yes—AI music isn't creative.
Using AI might be cheaper than paying a musician. If companies can use AI to produce popular
music that makes lots of money from people buying and listening to it, it could put musicians out of
work. If musicians can't earn money from music, there will be far fewer of them creating new songs.
Anyway, listening to music that was made by a computer isn't the same experience as listening to
human-made music. When musicians create songs, they put real feelings and experiences into their
work, which builds a deep connection with listeners through their music. Music produced by AI isn't
truly original, as it simply takes pieces from songs that have already been published. Therefore, it
cannot be considered creative.
No—AI can help spark new ideas.
When people turn on their radios or headphones and a great new song comes on, it makes them feel
good. A catchy tune brings people together to sing and dance. If people are enjoying music, who
cares whether it was made by a human or a machine? Music makers already use computers, which help
to perfect sound and mix different parts of a song. Like computers, AI can also help spark ideas. It
won't replace musicians but they can work with it. Building on music created by AI could save
time. It could allow lots more music to be produced and it could lead to new and special styles of music.
AI could create exciting tunes that humans could never have dreamed of.
1.
history
2. discussion
3. work/jobs
4. harder
5. stop/prevent/keep
6.
matter
7. tool/helper
8. beyond
9. Writing skills.(言之有理即可)
10.
AI can correct grammar and spelling mistakes.(言之有理即可)
阅读与回答问题(每小题2分,满分60分)
答案
1. history 2. discussion 3. work/jobs 4. harder 5. stop/
prevent/keep 6. matter 7. tool/helper 8. beyond
9. Writing skills.(言之有理即可)
10. AI can correct grammar and spelling mistakes.(言之有理即可)
prevent/keep 6. matter 7. tool/helper 8. beyond
9. Writing skills.(言之有理即可)
10. AI can correct grammar and spelling mistakes.(言之有理即可)
解析
【分析】
这是一篇主题为AI与音乐的任务型阅读题，解题时首先通读全文把握正反两方的核心观点，再逐空定位到原文对应的语句，结合空格前后的固定搭配、语义要求筛选最恰当的单词：1. 第1空结合人类数千年创作音乐的背景，匹配long的常用搭配即可得出答案；2. 第2空结合后文正反两方的不同观点，可判断AI创作音乐引发了相关讨论；3. 第3空对应AI会让音乐人失业的原文描述，推导AI会抢走音乐人的工作；4. 第4空出现than提示要用比较级，结合AI没有真实情感的特点，可得出它和听众建立联结比人类音乐更难；5. 第5空结合from的固定搭配，对应“阻止AI具备创造性”的语义即可；6. 第6空对应“只要人们喜欢音乐，创作者是谁就不重要”的原文观点，匹配常用表达；7. 第7空结合AI辅助音乐人激发灵感的属性，可判断它是创作的工具/助手；8. 第8空结合AI能做出人类想不到的旋律的特点，推导它推动音乐突破人类局限；最后9、10是开放题，结合AI辅助学英语的常识合理作答即可。
【解析】
1. 定位原文第一段"For thousands of years, humans have been making music for pleasure and to express themselves"，说明人类创作音乐有着悠久的历史，固定搭配have a long history表示“有着悠久的历史”，故填history。
2. 全文呈现了针对AI音乐是否影响创造力的正反两方不同观点，说明该现象引发了相关讨论，不定冠词a后接名词discussion，符合语境。
3. 定位原文第三段"it could put musicians out of work"，说明AI会抢走音乐人的工作，take work/jobs from real musicians完全匹配语义。
4. 原文提到人类创作的音乐融入真实情感，能和听众建立深层联结，AI音乐很难做到这点，空格后有than提示要用形容词比较级，harder表示“更困难的”，符合要求。
5. 空格后搭配from being creative，对应固定搭配stop/prevent/keep sth from doing sth，表示“阻止某物做某事”，契合AI拼接旧歌因此无法具备原生创造性的描述。
6. 定位原文第四段"If people are enjoying music, who cares whether it was made by a human or a machine?"，说明只要人们喜欢音乐，创作者是谁就不重要了，doesn't matter表示“没关系、不重要”，完全匹配语义。
7. 原文提到AI可以辅助音乐人激发灵感，是辅助创作的工具/助手，不定冠词a后接名词tool/helper，符合语境。
8. 语义为AI推动音乐突破人类的局限，介词beyond表示“超出、超越”，beyond human limits即“超越人类局限”，符合原文AI能创造出人类想象不到的旋律的描述。
9. 本题为开放题，任意列举AI可以辅助学习的英语技能即可，答案不唯一，言之有理即可。
10. 对应第9空列举的英语技能，说明AI对应的帮助方式即可，答案不唯一，言之有理即可。
【答案】
1. history 2. discussion 3. work/jobs 4. harder 5. stop/prevent/keep 6. matter 7. tool/helper 8. beyond 9. Writing skills.(言之有理即可) 10. AI can correct grammar and spelling mistakes.(言之有理即可)
【知识点】
任务型阅读信息提取，英语固定搭配，语篇理解
【点评】
本题以当下AI创作音乐的热点为命题载体，既考察学生从阅读语篇中精准定位信息、匹配常用短语的基础语言能力，最后两道开放题还引导学生结合实际生活思考AI在学习中的应用，兼顾基础考察和思维拓展，命题设计很灵活。
【难度系数】
0.6
这是一篇主题为AI与音乐的任务型阅读题，解题时首先通读全文把握正反两方的核心观点，再逐空定位到原文对应的语句，结合空格前后的固定搭配、语义要求筛选最恰当的单词：1. 第1空结合人类数千年创作音乐的背景，匹配long的常用搭配即可得出答案；2. 第2空结合后文正反两方的不同观点，可判断AI创作音乐引发了相关讨论；3. 第3空对应AI会让音乐人失业的原文描述，推导AI会抢走音乐人的工作；4. 第4空出现than提示要用比较级，结合AI没有真实情感的特点，可得出它和听众建立联结比人类音乐更难；5. 第5空结合from的固定搭配，对应“阻止AI具备创造性”的语义即可；6. 第6空对应“只要人们喜欢音乐，创作者是谁就不重要”的原文观点，匹配常用表达；7. 第7空结合AI辅助音乐人激发灵感的属性，可判断它是创作的工具/助手；8. 第8空结合AI能做出人类想不到的旋律的特点，推导它推动音乐突破人类局限；最后9、10是开放题，结合AI辅助学英语的常识合理作答即可。
【解析】
1. 定位原文第一段"For thousands of years, humans have been making music for pleasure and to express themselves"，说明人类创作音乐有着悠久的历史，固定搭配have a long history表示“有着悠久的历史”，故填history。
2. 全文呈现了针对AI音乐是否影响创造力的正反两方不同观点，说明该现象引发了相关讨论，不定冠词a后接名词discussion，符合语境。
3. 定位原文第三段"it could put musicians out of work"，说明AI会抢走音乐人的工作，take work/jobs from real musicians完全匹配语义。
4. 原文提到人类创作的音乐融入真实情感，能和听众建立深层联结，AI音乐很难做到这点，空格后有than提示要用形容词比较级，harder表示“更困难的”，符合要求。
5. 空格后搭配from being creative，对应固定搭配stop/prevent/keep sth from doing sth，表示“阻止某物做某事”，契合AI拼接旧歌因此无法具备原生创造性的描述。
6. 定位原文第四段"If people are enjoying music, who cares whether it was made by a human or a machine?"，说明只要人们喜欢音乐，创作者是谁就不重要了，doesn't matter表示“没关系、不重要”，完全匹配语义。
7. 原文提到AI可以辅助音乐人激发灵感，是辅助创作的工具/助手，不定冠词a后接名词tool/helper，符合语境。
8. 语义为AI推动音乐突破人类的局限，介词beyond表示“超出、超越”，beyond human limits即“超越人类局限”，符合原文AI能创造出人类想象不到的旋律的描述。
9. 本题为开放题，任意列举AI可以辅助学习的英语技能即可，答案不唯一，言之有理即可。
10. 对应第9空列举的英语技能，说明AI对应的帮助方式即可，答案不唯一，言之有理即可。
【答案】
1. history 2. discussion 3. work/jobs 4. harder 5. stop/prevent/keep 6. matter 7. tool/helper 8. beyond 9. Writing skills.(言之有理即可) 10. AI can correct grammar and spelling mistakes.(言之有理即可)
【知识点】
任务型阅读信息提取，英语固定搭配，语篇理解
【点评】
本题以当下AI创作音乐的热点为命题载体，既考察学生从阅读语篇中精准定位信息、匹配常用短语的基础语言能力，最后两道开放题还引导学生结合实际生活思考AI在学习中的应用，兼顾基础考察和思维拓展，命题设计很灵活。
【难度系数】
0.6
