登录
训练4
： （临夏州中考） According to a report, more than 3.7 million tourists visited the spot in 2023, with 42 per cent choosing camel rides.
2. How many tourists chose camel rides at the scenic spot in 2023?
A.More than 3.7 million tourists.
B.More than 4.2 million tourists.
C.More than 1.5 million tourists.
D.More than 2.4 million tourists.
： （临夏州中考） According to a report, more than 3.7 million tourists visited the spot in 2023, with 42 per cent choosing camel rides.
2. How many tourists chose camel rides at the scenic spot in 2023?
A.More than 3.7 million tourists.
B.More than 4.2 million tourists.
C.More than 1.5 million tourists.
D.More than 2.4 million tourists.
答案
2. C 数字计算题。根据“more than 3.7 million tourists visited the spot in 2023, with 42 per cent choosing camel rides”可知在2023年，超过370万游客参观了该景点，42%的游客选择骑骆驼，即大约3700000×0.42 = 1554000人骑骆驼。
解析
【分析】
拿到这道题首先明确题干的提问目标：求2023年选择骑骆驼的游客数量。第一步先返回题干给出的原文内容定位已知条件，找到两个核心数据：2023年该景点总游客数超过370万，选择骑骆驼的游客占总人数的42%。接下来只需要用总人数乘以对应占比算出部分量，再和四个选项的数字比对，就能匹配出正确答案，注意不要直接把原文给出的总人数、占比数字直接当作题干所求结果，避免误选。
【解析】
1. 定位原文关键信息：原文明确说明2023年该景点接待游客超过370万，其中42%的游客选择骑骆驼。
2. 代入数据计算选择骑骆驼的游客数量：
$3700000 × 42\% = 3700000 × 0.42 = 1554000$，即该部分游客数量超过150万。
3. 匹配选项：A选项是总游客数，不符合提问要求；B、D选项的数值和计算结果偏差极大，只有C选项的表述和计算结果一致。
【答案】C
【知识点】
阅读理解细节定位；百分比运算
【点评】
本题是中考英语常见的细节类数字计算题，难度较低，仅需要准确定位原文给出的两个基础数据，完成简单的百分比乘法运算即可得出答案，考生容易出现的失误是没有看清题干所求的是占比对应的部分人数，误将总游客数当作答案错选A。
【难度系数】
0.8
拿到这道题首先明确题干的提问目标：求2023年选择骑骆驼的游客数量。第一步先返回题干给出的原文内容定位已知条件，找到两个核心数据：2023年该景点总游客数超过370万，选择骑骆驼的游客占总人数的42%。接下来只需要用总人数乘以对应占比算出部分量，再和四个选项的数字比对，就能匹配出正确答案，注意不要直接把原文给出的总人数、占比数字直接当作题干所求结果，避免误选。
【解析】
1. 定位原文关键信息：原文明确说明2023年该景点接待游客超过370万，其中42%的游客选择骑骆驼。
2. 代入数据计算选择骑骆驼的游客数量：
$3700000 × 42\% = 3700000 × 0.42 = 1554000$，即该部分游客数量超过150万。
3. 匹配选项：A选项是总游客数，不符合提问要求；B、D选项的数值和计算结果偏差极大，只有C选项的表述和计算结果一致。
【答案】C
【知识点】
阅读理解细节定位；百分比运算
【点评】
本题是中考英语常见的细节类数字计算题，难度较低，仅需要准确定位原文给出的两个基础数据，完成简单的百分比乘法运算即可得出答案，考生容易出现的失误是没有看清题干所求的是占比对应的部分人数，误将总游客数当作答案错选A。
【难度系数】
0.8
训练1
体裁： 说明文 主题： 人际交往 难度： ★★★★ 建议用时： 8 min 正确率： /4
（新素材·年轻人“词穷” 原创）Are you good at expressing(表达) your ideas? Recently, China Youth Daily did a survey on people's verbal(言语的) skills. A total of 1,333 people took part. Most of them were well - educated people in their 20s and 30s. More than 60% of them had a bachelor's degree or higher.
In the survey, 47.1% said their verbal skills were poor. ① Chen Chen was one of them. He is a 28 - year - old designer from Beijing. He found that many people were not good at expressing themselves clearly(清楚地). This caused poor communication(交流) at work. “People don't like to describe problems clearly,” he said. “Instead, they use vague words, such as ‘this isn't right’ or ‘check it again’.” ②
③ Guo Xiao'an, a journalism professor at Chongqing University, said, “Their vocabulary hasn't changed much. It has even grown larger with the new words from the Internet. But these words have replaced the use of many traditional words. As a result, many young people are not good at using traditional words.” ④
The survey also asked about the reasons for people's poor verbal skills. 54% thought the main reason was that they read too little. 53% said they used Internet memes(热梗) and stickers too often. This made them less creative when they talked to people.
According to the survey, about 58% believed reading more was a good idea. And nearly half said talking to people face - to - face more often would also help. They believed this could give them more chances to practise their verbal skills.
1. According to the survey, how many people thought they had poor verbal skills? （数字计算题）
A. 628.
B. 720.
C. 773.
D. 800.
2. Why does the writer mention(提及) Chen Chen in Paragraph 2?
A. To tell the work and discoveries of Chen Chen.
B. To show people are bad at expressing their ideas.
C. To encourage people to describe problems clearly.
D. To advise people to have good communication at work.
3. Where can the sentence “Some experts(专家) also noticed the problem.” be best put in the passage?
A. ①
B. ②
C. ③
D. ④
4. According to the survey, what caused the poor verbal skills? （语义转换题）
①the overuse of memes
②reading less than before
③meeting people in person too often
④being less creative when talking to people
A. ①②
B. ①③
C. ②④
D. ①②④
体裁： 说明文 主题： 人际交往 难度： ★★★★ 建议用时： 8 min 正确率： /4
（新素材·年轻人“词穷” 原创）Are you good at expressing(表达) your ideas? Recently, China Youth Daily did a survey on people's verbal(言语的) skills. A total of 1,333 people took part. Most of them were well - educated people in their 20s and 30s. More than 60% of them had a bachelor's degree or higher.
In the survey, 47.1% said their verbal skills were poor. ① Chen Chen was one of them. He is a 28 - year - old designer from Beijing. He found that many people were not good at expressing themselves clearly(清楚地). This caused poor communication(交流) at work. “People don't like to describe problems clearly,” he said. “Instead, they use vague words, such as ‘this isn't right’ or ‘check it again’.” ②
③ Guo Xiao'an, a journalism professor at Chongqing University, said, “Their vocabulary hasn't changed much. It has even grown larger with the new words from the Internet. But these words have replaced the use of many traditional words. As a result, many young people are not good at using traditional words.” ④
The survey also asked about the reasons for people's poor verbal skills. 54% thought the main reason was that they read too little. 53% said they used Internet memes(热梗) and stickers too often. This made them less creative when they talked to people.
According to the survey, about 58% believed reading more was a good idea. And nearly half said talking to people face - to - face more often would also help. They believed this could give them more chances to practise their verbal skills.
1. According to the survey, how many people thought they had poor verbal skills? （数字计算题）
A. 628.
B. 720.
C. 773.
D. 800.
2. Why does the writer mention(提及) Chen Chen in Paragraph 2?
A. To tell the work and discoveries of Chen Chen.
B. To show people are bad at expressing their ideas.
C. To encourage people to describe problems clearly.
D. To advise people to have good communication at work.
3. Where can the sentence “Some experts(专家) also noticed the problem.” be best put in the passage?
A. ①
B. ②
C. ③
D. ④
4. According to the survey, what caused the poor verbal skills? （语义转换题）
①the overuse of memes
②reading less than before
③meeting people in person too often
④being less creative when talking to people
A. ①②
B. ①③
C. ②④
D. ①②④
答案
【语篇解读】本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了《中国青年报》的调查显示年轻人的语言表达能力较差的现象以及其原因和提高表达能力的方法。
1. A 细节理解题。根据第一段“A total of 1,333 people took part.”和第二段“In the survey, 47.1% said their verbal skills were poor.”可知受访者中有1333×47.1%≈628人认为自己的语言表达能力差。故选A。
2. B 推理判断题。根据第二段“In the survey, 47.1% said their verbal skills were poor. ① Chen Chen was one of them.”和“He found that many people were not good at expressing themselves clearly.”可推断本段列举这一例子是为了说明许多人的语言表达能力较差，不善于表达自己的观点。故选B。
3. C 补全文章题。根据第三段“Guo Xiao’an, a journalism professor at Chongqing University”可知本段介绍了重庆大学新闻学教授郭小安的观点。所填句“一些专家也注意到了这个问题。”能引出第三段的内容。故选C。
4. A 细节理解题。根据第四段“54% thought the main reason was that they read too little. 53% said they used Internet memes and stickers too often.”可知调查显示阅读量过少和过度使用网络热梗是年轻人的语言表达能力较差的原因。故选A。
1. A 细节理解题。根据第一段“A total of 1,333 people took part.”和第二段“In the survey, 47.1% said their verbal skills were poor.”可知受访者中有1333×47.1%≈628人认为自己的语言表达能力差。故选A。
2. B 推理判断题。根据第二段“In the survey, 47.1% said their verbal skills were poor. ① Chen Chen was one of them.”和“He found that many people were not good at expressing themselves clearly.”可推断本段列举这一例子是为了说明许多人的语言表达能力较差，不善于表达自己的观点。故选B。
3. C 补全文章题。根据第三段“Guo Xiao’an, a journalism professor at Chongqing University”可知本段介绍了重庆大学新闻学教授郭小安的观点。所填句“一些专家也注意到了这个问题。”能引出第三段的内容。故选C。
4. A 细节理解题。根据第四段“54% thought the main reason was that they read too little. 53% said they used Internet memes and stickers too often.”可知调查显示阅读量过少和过度使用网络热梗是年轻人的语言表达能力较差的原因。故选A。
解析
【分析】
拿到这篇人际交往主题的说明文阅读，我们可以逐题按定位原文、匹配逻辑的思路解题：
1. 第1题是数字计算题，先定位第一段找到调查总人数，再定位第二段找到对应人群的占比，相乘取近似值就能得到结果。
2. 第2题是推理判断题，问举例的作用，所有案例都是为了支撑段落核心论点，找到第二段开篇的核心观点，就能明确举陈晨例子的目的。
3. 第3题是句子复位题，先分析待填句的逻辑属性：它提到“专家也注意到问题”，是承上启下的过渡句，找到后文对应专家观点的段落开头位置，就能确定最合适的放置点。
4. 第4题是细节理解题，定位第四段筛选导致言语能力差的原因，注意区分“问题的诱因”和“诱因带来的次生结果”，排除不符合要求的表述即可。
【解析】
1. 由原文第一段“A total of 1,333 people took part.”可知本次调查总参与人数为1333人，结合第二段“In the survey, 47.1% said their verbal skills were poor.”给出的占比，计算可得1333×47.1%≈628人，对应选项A。
2. 第二段开篇就点明近半数受访者认为自己言语能力差，随后引入陈晨的案例，他本身就是这类表达能力不足的人群之一，同时也发现身边很多人无法清晰表达自我，该案例的作用就是佐证“很多人不擅长表达自身观点”的普遍现象，对应选项B。
3. 待填入句“Some experts also noticed the problem.”是过渡句，作用是承接上文普通受访者遇到的表达问题，引出下文的专家相关论述。③的位置位于第三段段首，第三段内容刚好是重庆大学新闻学教授郭小安对该现象的分析，放在此处逻辑衔接最顺畅，对应选项C。
4. 定位原文第四段，明确导致言语能力差的原因只有两个：一是受访者阅读量太少，二是过度使用网络热梗和表情包；“交谈时创造力下降”是过度使用热梗带来的结果，并非导致言语能力差的诱因，“频繁与人当面接触”是提升言语能力的方法，不属于问题成因，因此符合要求的只有①②，对应选项A。
【答案】
1. A 2. B 3. C 4. A
【知识点】
英语阅读理解，细节信息定位，语篇逻辑分析
【点评】
本题选用年轻人“词穷”的热点原创素材，贴合学生日常社交场景，题型覆盖数字计算、例证作用推断、语句复位等初中英语阅读高频考点，易错点集中在第4题，不少学生容易混淆问题的原因和原因引发的次生结果，解题时需要严格对照题干要求筛选信息，避开偷换概念的干扰项误导。
【难度系数】
0.4
拿到这篇人际交往主题的说明文阅读，我们可以逐题按定位原文、匹配逻辑的思路解题：
1. 第1题是数字计算题，先定位第一段找到调查总人数，再定位第二段找到对应人群的占比，相乘取近似值就能得到结果。
2. 第2题是推理判断题，问举例的作用，所有案例都是为了支撑段落核心论点，找到第二段开篇的核心观点，就能明确举陈晨例子的目的。
3. 第3题是句子复位题，先分析待填句的逻辑属性：它提到“专家也注意到问题”，是承上启下的过渡句，找到后文对应专家观点的段落开头位置，就能确定最合适的放置点。
4. 第4题是细节理解题，定位第四段筛选导致言语能力差的原因，注意区分“问题的诱因”和“诱因带来的次生结果”，排除不符合要求的表述即可。
【解析】
1. 由原文第一段“A total of 1,333 people took part.”可知本次调查总参与人数为1333人，结合第二段“In the survey, 47.1% said their verbal skills were poor.”给出的占比，计算可得1333×47.1%≈628人，对应选项A。
2. 第二段开篇就点明近半数受访者认为自己言语能力差，随后引入陈晨的案例，他本身就是这类表达能力不足的人群之一，同时也发现身边很多人无法清晰表达自我，该案例的作用就是佐证“很多人不擅长表达自身观点”的普遍现象，对应选项B。
3. 待填入句“Some experts also noticed the problem.”是过渡句，作用是承接上文普通受访者遇到的表达问题，引出下文的专家相关论述。③的位置位于第三段段首，第三段内容刚好是重庆大学新闻学教授郭小安对该现象的分析，放在此处逻辑衔接最顺畅，对应选项C。
4. 定位原文第四段，明确导致言语能力差的原因只有两个：一是受访者阅读量太少，二是过度使用网络热梗和表情包；“交谈时创造力下降”是过度使用热梗带来的结果，并非导致言语能力差的诱因，“频繁与人当面接触”是提升言语能力的方法，不属于问题成因，因此符合要求的只有①②，对应选项A。
【答案】
1. A 2. B 3. C 4. A
【知识点】
英语阅读理解，细节信息定位，语篇逻辑分析
【点评】
本题选用年轻人“词穷”的热点原创素材，贴合学生日常社交场景，题型覆盖数字计算、例证作用推断、语句复位等初中英语阅读高频考点，易错点集中在第4题，不少学生容易混淆问题的原因和原因引发的次生结果，解题时需要严格对照题干要求筛选信息，避开偷换概念的干扰项误导。
【难度系数】
0.4
