登录
B
体裁：议论文
主题：人与动物
难度：★★★★★
In the wild, wolves with broken legs often face an unlucky fate, waiting to die. Yet, in the Hoh Xil National Nature Reserve in Qinghai, one such wolf had a different fate. It grew from a poor, thin one to a fat, fit wolf because tourists in the area often fed it.
This “act of kindness” led people to ask: Should tourists feed the wolf? Supporters think that without feeding, the wolf would die because it couldn't get food by itself. But those who do not agree with the idea believe that humans should not mess with(干扰)natural order. Science, however, provides us with an answer.
Research published in Scientific Reports in June, 2019 studied how human feeding affected(影响)the lives of bottle-nose dolphins near Bunbury, Australia. Dolphins there can sometimes get food from the Dolphin Discovery Centre. After studying more than 10 years of data, the scientists found that dolphins looking for food from boats had a higher risk of death than those who found food themselves. This is because they may get hit by boats or caught by fishing nets.
Feeding wild animals may lead them to depend on humans for food, said Dai Qiang, a scientist at the Chengdu Institute of Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. What's more, sick animals may bring diseases(疾病) to people who feed them.
So, if we come across a wild animal that seems to need our help, what should we do? Does it mean there is nothing we can do? Of course not. Qi Xinzhang, the director of Xining Wildlife Park, advised that ▲.
1. Why does the writer talk about the wolf in Qinghai?
A. To show the writer's opinion.
B. To guide readers to think.
C. To lead into the topic.
D. To introduce the main idea of the passage.
2. How does human feeding affect bottle-nose dolphins?
A. Dolphins become more friendly to humans.
B. Dolphins start to know the dangers from humans.
C. The dolphins fed by humans die more easily.
D. More dolphins choose to find food by themselves.
3. 新趋势·补全文章 According to the passage, which of the following is the best to fill in the blank “ ▲ ”?
A. it's necessary to stay away from it
B. it's a better choice to throw some food to it
C. it's unnecessary to do anything for it because it has its own fate
D. it's best to report the animal to the government instead of just feeding it
4. What's the purpose of this passage?
A. It advises people not to feed wild animals by themselves.
B. It shows that it is correct for people to feed wild animals.
C. It introduces different wild animals in the Nature Reserve.
D. It tells people some ways to protect wild animals.
体裁：议论文
主题：人与动物
难度：★★★★★
In the wild, wolves with broken legs often face an unlucky fate, waiting to die. Yet, in the Hoh Xil National Nature Reserve in Qinghai, one such wolf had a different fate. It grew from a poor, thin one to a fat, fit wolf because tourists in the area often fed it.
This “act of kindness” led people to ask: Should tourists feed the wolf? Supporters think that without feeding, the wolf would die because it couldn't get food by itself. But those who do not agree with the idea believe that humans should not mess with(干扰)natural order. Science, however, provides us with an answer.
Research published in Scientific Reports in June, 2019 studied how human feeding affected(影响)the lives of bottle-nose dolphins near Bunbury, Australia. Dolphins there can sometimes get food from the Dolphin Discovery Centre. After studying more than 10 years of data, the scientists found that dolphins looking for food from boats had a higher risk of death than those who found food themselves. This is because they may get hit by boats or caught by fishing nets.
Feeding wild animals may lead them to depend on humans for food, said Dai Qiang, a scientist at the Chengdu Institute of Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. What's more, sick animals may bring diseases(疾病) to people who feed them.
So, if we come across a wild animal that seems to need our help, what should we do? Does it mean there is nothing we can do? Of course not. Qi Xinzhang, the director of Xining Wildlife Park, advised that ▲.
1. Why does the writer talk about the wolf in Qinghai?
A. To show the writer's opinion.
B. To guide readers to think.
C. To lead into the topic.
D. To introduce the main idea of the passage.
2. How does human feeding affect bottle-nose dolphins?
A. Dolphins become more friendly to humans.
B. Dolphins start to know the dangers from humans.
C. The dolphins fed by humans die more easily.
D. More dolphins choose to find food by themselves.
3. 新趋势·补全文章 According to the passage, which of the following is the best to fill in the blank “ ▲ ”?
A. it's necessary to stay away from it
B. it's a better choice to throw some food to it
C. it's unnecessary to do anything for it because it has its own fate
D. it's best to report the animal to the government instead of just feeding it
4. What's the purpose of this passage?
A. It advises people not to feed wild animals by themselves.
B. It shows that it is correct for people to feed wild animals.
C. It introduces different wild animals in the Nature Reserve.
D. It tells people some ways to protect wild animals.
答案
1. C 推理判断题。根据第一段“Yet, in the Hoh Xil National Nature Reserve in Qinghai, one such wolf had a different fate.”和第二段第一句“This 'act of kindness' led people to ask: Should tourists feed the wolf?”可知，作者提到青海的狼是为了引出文章的话题。故选 C。
2. C 推理判断题。根据第三段“After studying more than 10 years of data, the scientists found that dolphins looking for food from boats had a higher risk of death than those who found food themselves. This is because they may get hit by boats or caught by fishing nets.”可知，研究表明从船上寻找食物的海豚比自己寻找食物的海豚死亡风险更高，即人类喂养的海豚更容易死亡。故选 C。
3. D 补全文章题。根据最后一段“So, if we come across a wild animal that seems to need our help, what should we do? Does it mean there is nothing we can do? Of course not.”可知，设空处应该给出建议，如何应对需要帮助的野生动物，选项 D“最好向政府报告这只动物，而不是仅仅喂它”符合语境。故选 D。
4. A 推理判断题。阅读全文可知，本文主要讨论了是否应该投喂野生动物的话题，文章第三和第四段讲述了投喂野生动物可能对野生动物和人类自己造成的不良后果，因此本文的写作意图是建议人们不要自行投喂野生动物。故选 A。
2. C 推理判断题。根据第三段“After studying more than 10 years of data, the scientists found that dolphins looking for food from boats had a higher risk of death than those who found food themselves. This is because they may get hit by boats or caught by fishing nets.”可知，研究表明从船上寻找食物的海豚比自己寻找食物的海豚死亡风险更高，即人类喂养的海豚更容易死亡。故选 C。
3. D 补全文章题。根据最后一段“So, if we come across a wild animal that seems to need our help, what should we do? Does it mean there is nothing we can do? Of course not.”可知，设空处应该给出建议，如何应对需要帮助的野生动物，选项 D“最好向政府报告这只动物，而不是仅仅喂它”符合语境。故选 D。
4. A 推理判断题。阅读全文可知，本文主要讨论了是否应该投喂野生动物的话题，文章第三和第四段讲述了投喂野生动物可能对野生动物和人类自己造成的不良后果，因此本文的写作意图是建议人们不要自行投喂野生动物。故选 A。
解析
【分析】
解题思路梳理：这是一篇围绕“是否可以私自投喂野生动物”展开的议论文，解题时首先通读全文梳理行文逻辑：作者先以青海可可西里断腿狼被游客投喂的特殊事例引入，紧接着抛出核心争议话题，再通过科研数据、专家观点论证私自投喂对野生动物和人类自身的双重危害，最后给出遇到需要帮助的野生动物的正确应对方式。逐题思考路径：
1. 第1题判断作者提及青海的狼的写作目的，重点关注第一段和第二段的衔接关系，事例之后马上引出核心讨论问题，对应引出话题的作用；
2. 第2题定位题干关键词“bottle-nose dolphins”到第三段的科研内容，直接提取研究结论匹配选项；
3. 第3题补全段落结尾的专家建议，结合前文“遇到需要帮助的野生动物不是什么都不能做，但也不能私自投喂”的语境，排除不符合逻辑的选项，选出合理的专业求助类建议；
4. 第4题判断全文写作目的，结合全文对私自投喂危害的论述，提炼作者的核心倡导即可。
【解析】
1. 推理判断题：根据第一段介绍断腿狼被游客投喂的特殊经历，第二段紧接着抛出核心问题“Should tourists feed the wolf?”，可知作者讲述青海的狼的故事是为了自然引出“是否应该投喂野生动物”的全文核心话题，其余选项均不符合开篇事例的功能，因此选C。
2. 细节理解题：根据第三段研究结论“scientists found that dolphins looking for food from boats had a higher risk of death than those who found food themselves”，可知依赖人类投喂获取食物的海豚死亡风险远高于自主觅食的海豚，也就是被人类投喂的海豚更容易死亡，其余选项表述均和原文内容不符，因此选C。
3. 语篇补全题：前文提到遇到看似需要帮助的野生动物，我们不是什么都不能做，结合前文已经论证了私自投喂的危害，可知专家给出的合理建议应该是不私自投喂，选择更专业的处理方式，D选项“最好向政府相关部门上报这只动物，而不是仅仅投喂它”完全符合语境，其余选项都不符合前文逻辑，因此选D。
4. 主旨意图题：全文通过事例、科研数据、专家观点多维度论证了私自投喂野生动物既会让野生动物丧失自主觅食能力、提升死亡风险，也可能把动物携带的疾病带给人类，核心目的是倡导人们不要私自投喂野生动物，其余选项均偏离核心讨论主题，因此选A。
【答案】
1. C 2. C 3. D 4. A
【知识点】
阅读理解细节定位，议论文行文逻辑，推理判断能力
【点评】
本题是典型的初中英语议论文阅读题，考点覆盖了写作手法判断、细节信息提取、语篇逻辑补全、主旨意图推断四大高频阅读题型，既考查学生快速定位原文关键信息的基础阅读能力，也要求学生理清议论文“引入话题-论证观点-给出结论”的行文脉络，同时渗透了正确的野生动物保护理念，引导学生建立人与自然和谐共处的意识，对学生的综合阅读能力有一定要求。
【难度系数】
0.4
解题思路梳理：这是一篇围绕“是否可以私自投喂野生动物”展开的议论文，解题时首先通读全文梳理行文逻辑：作者先以青海可可西里断腿狼被游客投喂的特殊事例引入，紧接着抛出核心争议话题，再通过科研数据、专家观点论证私自投喂对野生动物和人类自身的双重危害，最后给出遇到需要帮助的野生动物的正确应对方式。逐题思考路径：
1. 第1题判断作者提及青海的狼的写作目的，重点关注第一段和第二段的衔接关系，事例之后马上引出核心讨论问题，对应引出话题的作用；
2. 第2题定位题干关键词“bottle-nose dolphins”到第三段的科研内容，直接提取研究结论匹配选项；
3. 第3题补全段落结尾的专家建议，结合前文“遇到需要帮助的野生动物不是什么都不能做，但也不能私自投喂”的语境，排除不符合逻辑的选项，选出合理的专业求助类建议；
4. 第4题判断全文写作目的，结合全文对私自投喂危害的论述，提炼作者的核心倡导即可。
【解析】
1. 推理判断题：根据第一段介绍断腿狼被游客投喂的特殊经历，第二段紧接着抛出核心问题“Should tourists feed the wolf?”，可知作者讲述青海的狼的故事是为了自然引出“是否应该投喂野生动物”的全文核心话题，其余选项均不符合开篇事例的功能，因此选C。
2. 细节理解题：根据第三段研究结论“scientists found that dolphins looking for food from boats had a higher risk of death than those who found food themselves”，可知依赖人类投喂获取食物的海豚死亡风险远高于自主觅食的海豚，也就是被人类投喂的海豚更容易死亡，其余选项表述均和原文内容不符，因此选C。
3. 语篇补全题：前文提到遇到看似需要帮助的野生动物，我们不是什么都不能做，结合前文已经论证了私自投喂的危害，可知专家给出的合理建议应该是不私自投喂，选择更专业的处理方式，D选项“最好向政府相关部门上报这只动物，而不是仅仅投喂它”完全符合语境，其余选项都不符合前文逻辑，因此选D。
4. 主旨意图题：全文通过事例、科研数据、专家观点多维度论证了私自投喂野生动物既会让野生动物丧失自主觅食能力、提升死亡风险，也可能把动物携带的疾病带给人类，核心目的是倡导人们不要私自投喂野生动物，其余选项均偏离核心讨论主题，因此选A。
【答案】
1. C 2. C 3. D 4. A
【知识点】
阅读理解细节定位，议论文行文逻辑，推理判断能力
【点评】
本题是典型的初中英语议论文阅读题，考点覆盖了写作手法判断、细节信息提取、语篇逻辑补全、主旨意图推断四大高频阅读题型，既考查学生快速定位原文关键信息的基础阅读能力，也要求学生理清议论文“引入话题-论证观点-给出结论”的行文脉络，同时渗透了正确的野生动物保护理念，引导学生建立人与自然和谐共处的意识，对学生的综合阅读能力有一定要求。
【难度系数】
0.4
